Główna treść artykułu

Abstrakt

Adult learning and education (ALE) policies are studied in this essay in relation to various conceptions of democracy, and of post-democracy. The author observes that the dominant political discourses, notably in the European Union, have been influenced by technocratic conceptions of ALE. In this context, and invoking the imperatives of the knowledge society, ALE for cognitive democracy and for participatory forms of deliberative democracy tends to be diminished by elitist theories. This results in the subordination of ALE to formal democracy and proceduralism, as well as to hetero government carried out by specialists.
The post-democratic dimensions in ALE policies have weakened the potential for promoting an educated democracy and the development of a knowledge democracy capable of recognising different educational epistemologies and various forms of knowledge. Understanding the processes that have led to an erosion of democracy in ALE public policies requires the study of the impacts produced by new meritocratic ideologies and expertocracy, induced by discourses around the global race for talent.
It is concluded that more than a century of democratic educational thinking, of various shades, have been overtaken by the impacts of new managerialism on education, under the rigours of meritocracy, efficiency, and competitive performativity. These and other elements of the global education reform constitute research problems confronting educational communities and academic researchers. They are required to understand the politicityin their research agendas and to democratise it, seeking to strengthen their relative autonomy for critical inquiry.

Słowa kluczowe

adult learning and education policies democracy post-democracy meritocracy research agenda .

Szczegóły artykułu

Jak cytować
Lima, L. (2023). Democratic adult education as a research problem in the context of post-democracy. Dyskursy Młodych Andragogów, (24), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.34768/dma.vi24.693

Bibliografia

  1. Adorno, T.W. (2000) Introduction to sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  2. Bachelard, G. (1938) La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin.
  3. Bagnall, R.G. & Hodge, S. (2018) Contemporary adult and lifelong education and learning: An epistemological analysis. In: M. Milana, S. Webb, J. Holford, R. Waller, P. Jarvis (eds.) The Palgrave international handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 13-34. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55783-4_2.
  4. Berger, P.L. (1963) Invitation to sociology. A humanistic perspective. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1997) Les usages sociaux de la science. Pour une sociologie clinique du champ scientifique. Versailles: Éditions Quae.
  6. Brown, Ph. & Tannack, S. (2009) Education, meritocracy and the global war for talent. Journal of Education Policy, 24 (4), 377-392.
  7. CEE (2000) Towards a European research area. Commission of the European Communities [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52000DC0006&from=EN [30.10.2022].
  8. CEE (2011) Innovation Union Competitiveness Report. Commission of the European Communities [online]. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication detail?p_p_id=publicationDetailsActions_PublicationDetailsActionsPortlet_INSTANCE
  9. _P7Lc96wTRLvv&p_p_lifecycle=2&p_p_state=maximized&p_p_cacheability=cacheLevelPage&cellarId=61d64f10-2e32-443d
  10. -a636-4ceee8dc1195&requestAction=shortUrl [6.02.2023].
  11. Clarke, J. & Newman, J. (1997) The managerial state. Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.
  12. Crouch, C. (2004) Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Dewey, J. (1916) Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: MacMillan.
  14. European Union (2000) Commission Staff Working Paper. A memorandum on lifelong learning. Commission of the European Communities. Brussels: SEC(2000)1832 [online]. Available at: https://uil.unesco.org/i/doc/lifelong-learning/policies/european-communities-a-memorandumon-lifelong-learning.pdf [6.02.2023].
  15. European Union (2001) Communication from the Commission. Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. Commission of the European Communities. Brussels: COM (2001) 678 final, 2001 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.
  16. europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri= COM:2001:0678:FIN:EN:PDF [6.02.2023].
  17. European Union (2006a) Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on Key competences for lifelong learning. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Brussels: (2006/962/EC) [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF [6.02.2023].
  18. European Union (2006b) Decision N.º 1720/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 Establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Brussels [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32006D1720 [6.02.2023].
  19. European Union (2012) Rethinking Education: Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Strasbourg: COM (2012) 669 final [online]. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu [2.07.2018].
  20. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York (NY): Herder and Herder.
  21. Freire, P. (1975) Extensão ou comunicação?Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
  22. Freire, P. (1993) Política e educação. São Paulo: Cortez.
  23. Freire, P. (1996) Pedagogia da autonomia. Saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
  24. Habermas, J. (1987) Knowledge and human interests. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
  25. Hall, B.L. (2016) Towards a knowledge democracy movement. In: R. Evans, E. Kurantowicz, E. Lucio-Villegas (eds.) Researching and transforming adult learning communities. The local/global context.Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 15-26.
  26. Illich, I. (1973) Tools for conviviality. New York: Marion Boyars Publishers.
  27. Lafont, C. (2020) Democracy without shortcuts. A participatory conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Lane, J.-E. (2000) New public management. London: Routledge.
  29. Lima, L.C. (2012) Patterns of institutional management: Democratisation, autonomy and the managerialist canon. In: G. Neave & A. Amaral (eds.) Higher education in Portugal, 1974-2009. A nation, a generation [online]. Dordrecht: Springer, 287-306. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2135-7_12.
  30. Lima, L.C. (2015) “A melhor ciência”: o académico-empreendedor e a produção de conhecimento científico económicamente relevante. In: A. M. Catani, J. F. Oliveira (eds.) Educação superior e produção de conhecimento. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 11-34.
  31. Lima, L.C. (2018) Adult and permanent education in times of crisis: A critical perspective based on Freire and Gelpi. Studies in the Education of Adults [online], 50(2), 1-20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2018.1523087.
  32. Lima, L.C. (2021) Democracia e educação: Dewey em tempos de crise da educação democrática. Education Policy Analysis Archives [online], 29(154), 1-15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5881.
  33. Lima, L.C. (2022) Adult learning and mainstream education discourse. Revisiting Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed. In: R. Evans, E. Kurantowicz, & E. Lucio-Villegas (eds.) Remaking communities and adult learning. Social and community-based learning, new forms of knowledge and action for change. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 19-36.
  34. Massenet, M. (1975) La nouvelle gestion publique. Pour un Etat sans bureaucratie. Suresnes: Hommes et Techniques.
  35. Michels, R. (1968) Political parties. A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: The Free Press.
  36. Mills, C.W. (1959) The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
  37. OECD (1996) The knowledge-based economy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  38. Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Plume.
  39. Pateman, C. (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Radnor, H., Koshy, V. & Taylor, A. (2007) Gifts, talents and meritocracy. Journal of Education Policy, 22 (3), 283-299.
  41. Rancière, J. (1996) O desentendimento: política e filosofía. São Paulo: Editora 34.
  42. Rasmussen, P. (2021) Public reason, adult education and social imagination. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults[online], 12 (1), 15-19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.ojs3465.
  43. Sandel, M.J. (2020) The tyranny of merit. What’s become of the common good?New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  44. Santos, B.S. (2014) Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
  45. Schumpeter, J.A. (2010) Capitalism, socialism & democracy. London: Routledge.
  46. Self, P. (1993) Government by the market? The politics of public choice. London: Macmillan.
  47. Teichler, U. (2021) Are academics driven by managerialism? Governance and the changing role of academics on the way towards a knowledge society. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia [online],46, 13-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15388/ActPaed.2021.46.1.
  48. Walters, S. (2022) Learning about climate justice in times of drought and Covid-19. International Journal of Lifelong Education [online], 41 (1), 45-59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2021.1982038.
  49. Young, M. (1958) The rise of the meritocracy, 1870-2033. An essay on education and equality. London: Thames and Hudson.