Abstract
Higher education is subject to constant change. It is influenced by external factors, such as demographic and generational changes, globalization, technological progress, as well as internal factors, such as the forms and methods of education used, and the way the institution is managed. In recent years, one of the key changes in higher education, which was influenced by both internal and external factors, was the popularization of remote education, caused by the coronavirus pandemic. In many ways, this was a challenge for education providers, lecturers, and students. The lack of preparation of participants on both sides of the education process for the unexpected situation resulted in numerous errors. Their consequences were significant for the quality of education, but also for the mental condition of students. Currently, remote education is used as a supporting or basic form of education, which is why it is so important to study the factors that are significant for its quality. Additionally, today’s students belong to Generation Z, which also determines the introduction of changes in the approach to learning.
The research results were based on the opinions of 261 students representing Generation Z on the implementation of higher education in a remote form and the needs of students for coping with various types of difficulties resulting from remote studying. Based on the quantitative research conducted in this project, comprising a questionnaire and open-ended questions, it can be stated that representatives of Generation Z, studying remotely, felt educational difficulties the most. These resulted from the need to increase their own workload in relation to stationary education and from the form of instruction used by lecturers regardless of the type of classes conducted. Students felt equally strongly about social difficulties caused by the lack of direct contact with lecturers and other students. Remote education also generated difficulties of a psychological nature. Therefore, students expected substantive and emotional support from lecturers, but also from other specialists, including psychologists, mentors, career advisors. They also expected lecturers to present and respect specific principles of study and assessment. Among the factors that are most important for increasing student engagement in studying, the respondents recognized the change in the approach of lecturers to teaching. They postulated the use of activating methods in distance learning, the use of interactive digital media, indicating the practical application of the theoretical knowledge provided, creating opportunities to combine studies with the job market, a partnership approach on the lecturers’ side, as well as the use of positive reinforcement by lecturers and the university.
The final part presents conclusions and recommendations regarding the organization and implementation of distance learning at a higher level for contemporary students, representatives of Generation Z.
References
Adobe (2017) Gen Z in the Classroom: Creating the Future. Adobe Education Creativity Study [online]. Dostępny na: http://www.adobeeducate.com/genz/global-education-genz [1.08.2024].
Babicka-Wirkus, A., Cywiński, A., Muoki, J.S. i Walat, W. (2021) Gaps in online education in
the times of a pandemic in the opinion of Polish and Kenyan students. Dyskursy Młodych
Andragogów/Adult Education Discourses [online], 22, 183-195. Dostępny na: https://doi.
org/10.34768/dma.vi22.618.
Barhate, B. i Dirani, K.M. (2022) Career aspirations of generation Z: a systematic literature
review. European Journal of Training and Development [online], 46(1/2), 139-157. Dostępny
na: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0124.
Chillakuri, B. (2020) Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding, Journal
of Organizational Change Management [online]. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.1108/
JOCM-02-2020-0058.
Chirkowska-Smolak, T., Górecki, T., Klakus, M., Metzger, W. i Szargan, M. (2023a) The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory: Student Survey (MBI-SS) in Poland, Polish
Psychological Bulletin [online], 54(3), 207-216. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.24425/
ppb.2023.
Chirkowska-Smolak, T., Piorunek, M. i Garbacik, Ż. (2023b) Construction and validation of
the Areas of Academic Life Scale to measure organizational risk factors for student burnout,
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health [online], 36(6), 798-811. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02173.
Chirkowska-Smolak, T., Piorunek, M., Górecki, T., Garbacik, Ż., Drabik-Podgórna, V. i Kławsiuć-
Zduńczyk, A. (2023c) Academic Burnout of Polish Students: A Latent Profile Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [online], 20 (6). Dostępny
na: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064828.
Chory, R.M. i Offstein, E.H. (2017) “Your Professor Will Know You as a Person”: Evaluating and
Rethinking the Relational Boundaries Between Faculty and Students. Journal of Management
Education [online], 41(1), 9-38. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916647986.
Cilliers, E.J. (2017) The challenge of teaching generation Z, People: International Journal of Social Sciences [online], 3(1), 188-198. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198.
Coe, E., Doy, A., Enomoto, K. i Healy, Ch. (2023) Gen Z mental health: The impact of tech and
social media. McKinsey [online], Dostępny na: https://www.mckinsey.com/mhi/our-insights/
gen-z-mental-health-the-impact-of-tech-and-social-media#/ [1.08.2024].
Dolot, A. (2018) The characteristic of Generation Z, e-mentor [online], 2(74), 44-50. Dostępny
na: http://dx.doi.org/10.15219/em74.1351.
Długosz, P. (2020) Neurotyczne pokolenie koronawirusa? Raport z II fali badań krakowskich
studentów. Kraków: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego im. KEN
w Krakowie.
Ernst and Young (2018) Next-Gen workforce: secret weapon or biggest challenge? Ernst and Young [online]. Dostępny na: https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/en_gl/topics/
consumer-products/consumer-products-pdfs/ey-pdf-next-gen-workfor ce- secret-weaponor-biggest-challenge.pdf [1.08.2024].
EY (2021) Gen Z is poised to reframe the future, but are business and education ready? EY [online]. Dostępny na: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/about-us/corporate-responsibility/how-businessand-education-can-help-gen-z-reframe-the-future [1.08.2024].
Gagacka, M. i Sałata, E. (2020) Kompetencje nauczycieli i wykładowców w procesie edukacji
zdalnej – perspektywa studentów. Edukacja Ustawiczna Dorosłych [online], 4, 39-54. Dostępny
na: https://doi.org/10.34866/8ns5-tz47.
Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2023a) Polska w liczbach. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny
[online]. Dostępny na: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/inne-opracowania/inne-opracowania-zbiorcze/polska-w-liczbach-2023,14,16.html [1.08.2024].
Główny Urząd Statystyczny (2023b) Sytuacja demograficzna Polski do 2022 r. Warszawa: Główny
Urząd Statystyczny [online]. Dostępny na: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ ludnosc/
ludnosc/sytuacja-demograficzna-polski-do-roku-2022,40,3.html [1.08.2024].
Grow, J.M., Yang, S. (2018) Generation-Z Enters the Advertising Workplace: Expectations
Through a Gendered Lens [online], Journal of Advertising Education, 22(1), 7-22. Dostępny
na: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098048218768595.
Instytut Badawczy IPC i Politechnika Wrocławska (2024) Skok w dorosłość. Wartości, ambicje
i plany uczniów starszych klas szkół średnich. Raport z badań. Wrocław: Instytut Badawczy IPC
i Politechnika Wrocławska [online]. Dostępny na: https://pwr.edu.pl/fcp/4GBUKOQtTKlQ
hbx08SlkTUhZeUTgtCgg9ACFDC0RFTm9PFRYqCl5tDXdAGHoV/1/public/news_team/
pdf/pwr_raport_online.pdf [1.08.2024].
Kławsiuć-Zduńczyk, A. (2023) Czynniki organizacyjne a syndrom wypalenia akademickiego
studentów, Edukacja Ustawiczna Dorosłych [online], 123(4), 321-337. Dostępny na: https://
doi.org/10.34866/sydq-j388.
Kosiewicz-Budnicka, R. (2021) Kształcenie zdalne studentów pedagogiki w czasie pandemii
COVID-19. Studia z Teorii Wychowania, XII 3(36), 189-205. Dostępny na: https://doi.
org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.4819.
Kulawska, E. (2021) Kształcenie zdalne, poziom stresu i dobrostan psychiczny studentów pedagogiki w pierwszej fazie pandemii choroby COVID-19. Forum Pedagogiczne, 11(2), 149-166. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.21697/fp.2021.2.11.
Lewartowicz, U. (2022) Edukacja zdalna w kontekście specyfiki kształcenia animatorów kultury.
Komunikat z badań. Dyskursy Młodych Andragogów, 23, 163-181. Dostępny na: https://doi.
org/10.34768/dma.vi23.654.
Limanówka, P., Laska, J., Szczuraszyk, A., Łacwik, J., Kuca, J. i Kasperczyk, J. (2023) Wpływ
pandemii COVID-19 na zdrowie psychiczne studentów kierunku lekarskiego w Polsce.
Psychiatria [online], 20(3), 109-116. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.5603/psych.95511.
Malewski, M. (2010) Od nauczania do uczenia się. O paradygmatycznej zmianie w andragogice.
Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej.
Maslach, C. i Leiter, M.P. (2016) Understanding the burnout experience: recent research and
its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric
Association [online], 15(2), 103-111. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20311.
Miller, A.C. i Mills, B. (2019) If They Don’t Care, I Don’t Care. Millennial and Generation
Z Students and the Impact of Faculty Caring. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and
Learning [online], 19, 78-89. Dostępny na: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1234123 [1.08.2024].
Seemiller, C. i Grace, M. (2017) Generation Z: Educating and Engaging the Next Generation
of Students, About Campus [online], 22(3), 21-26. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.1002/
abc.21293.
Schwieger, D. i Ladwig, Ch. (2018) Reaching and Retaining the Next Generation: Adapting to
the Expectations of Gen Z in the Classroom. Information Systems Education Journal [online], 16(3), 45-54. Dostępny na: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1179303.pdf [1.08.2024].
Turner, A. (2015) Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest, The Journal of Individual
Psychology [online], 71(2), 103-113. Dostępny na: https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021.
Twenge, J.M. (2019) iGen. Dlaczego dzieciaki dorastające w sieci są mniej zbuntowane, bardziej
tolerancyjne, mniej szczęśliwe – i zupełnie nieprzygotowane do dorosłości. Sopot: Wydawnictwo Smak Słowa.
Twenge, J.M. (2023) Pokolenia. Prawdziwe różnice między pokoleniami X, Y, Z, baby boomersami i cichym pokoleniem oraz co one oznaczają dla przyszłości zachodniego świata. Sopot: Wydawnictwo Smak Słowa.
Uniwersytet SWPS i Agencja They.pl (2023) Raport Gen Z o sobie i otaczającym ich świecie. Jakie
są polskie Zetki?. Warszawa: Uniwersytet SWPS i Agencja They.pl. Dostępny na: https://swps.
pl/nauka-i-badania/nasze-dzialania/badania-i-wdrozenia/35313-jakie-sa-polskie-zetkiraport-ekspercki-o-mlodej-gene racji [1.08.2024].
White, J.E. (2017) Meet Generation Z. Understanding and Reaching the New Post-Christian World. Michigan: Baker Publishing Group.
Wiedmer, T. (2015) Generations do differ: best practices in leading traditionalists, boomers, and
generations X, Y, and Z, Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin [online], 82(1). Dostępny na: https://
www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Generations-Do-Differ%3A-Best-Practices-in-LeadingX%2C-Wiedmer/302d988fffb67c178001c253dec0ce8024967364 [1.08.2024].

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Adult Education Discourses

/
Language